Ash

TODO: Add description

TODO LIST (in no order)

• Add central API configuration DSL api do ... end
  • Use this for default_page_size and max_page_size
• Make our router cabaple of describing its routes in mix phx.routes Chris McCord says that we could probably power that, seeing as phoenix controls both APIs, and that capability could be added to Plug.Router
• Finish the serializer
• Make primary key type configurable
• Make a DSL for join tables to support complex validation/hooks into how they work, support more than just table names in join_through
• DSL level validations! Things like includes validating that their chain exists. All DSL structs should be strictly validated when they are created.
• Especially at compile time, we should never ignore or skip invalid options. If an option is present and invalid, an error is raised.
• break up the Ash module
• Wire up/formalize the error handling
• Ensure that errors are properly propagated up from the data_layer behaviour, and every operation is allowed to fail
• figure out the ecto schema warning
• all actions need to be performed in a transaction
• document authorization thoroughly. batch (default) checks need to return a list of ids for which the check passed.
• So many parts of the system are reliant on things having an id key explicitly. THis will need to be addressed some day, and will be a huge pain in the ass
• Validate that the user resource has a get action
• params should be solidified. Perhaps as a struct. Or perhaps just renamed to action_params where it is used.
• Since actions contain rules now, consider making it possible to list each action as its own do block, with an internal DSL for configuring the action. (overkill?)
• Validate rules at creation
• Maybe fix the crappy parts of optimal and bring it in for opts validation?
• The ecto internals that live on structs are going to cause problems w/ pluggability of backends, like the %Ecto.Association.NotLoaded{}. That backend may need to scrub the ecto specifics off of those structs.
• Add a mixin compatibility checker framework, to allow for mix_ins to declare what features they do/don't support.
• Make Ash.Type that is a superset of things like Ecto.Type. If we bring in ecto database-less(looking like more and more of a good idea to me) that kind of thing gets easier and we can potentially lean on ecto for type validations well.
• use a process to hold constructed DSL state, and then coalesce it all at the end. This can clean things up, and also allow us to potentially eliminate the registry. This will probably go hand in hand w/ the "capabilities" layer, where the DSL confirms that your data layer is capable of performing everything that your DSL declares
• make ets dep optional
• Bake in descriptions to the DSL